ONLF Response to the Somali Cabinet Decision on the Refoulement of Mr Abdikarin Sh Muse to Ethiopia

Satenaw
By Satenaw September 9, 2017 06:43

Statement by Ogaden National Liberation Front (ONLF)

September 8, 2017

ONLF Response to the Somali Cabinet Decision on the Refoulement of Mr Abdikarin Sh Muse to Ethiopia

On September 6, 2017 the minister of information of Somalia read a statement  in which he claimed that ONLF has a relationship with Al-Shabab and was involved in Activities that are endangering the Security of the Somali Republic. This disinformation exercise by Mr Kheyre’s cabinet was reached  in order to justify the illegal rendition of Mr Abdikarin Sh. Muse an ONLF executive member living in Mogadishu for the last three years.

The decision read by the Minister was based on the so-called agreements between representatives of Galmudug Regional State and puppet administration in Jigjiga (Ogaden) with regards to cooperate in fighting  ONLF and Al-Shabaab. Furthermore, as the Minister stated this decision was intended to safeguard the security and wellbeing of Somalia and the neighbouring states. He also stated that the Cabinet bans any armed group to use Somalia as base to threaten the security of neighbouring countries.

ONLF  categorically rejects these accusations regarding relationship with Al-Shabab or engaging in armed activities in or originating from Somalia.   ONLF has never engaged in  or conducted any activity in Somalia that will pose a threat to either the Somali people or their government and as matter of policy doesn’t conduct any military activities outside  the Somali  territory under Ethiopian rule. In fact, ONLF members have been on many occasions killed, detained or handed over to Ethiopian by the regional warlords or Al-Shabab but has never retaliated  against them by choice in order to respect the fabric of Somali Unity and not  to fuel  the already volatile situation in Somalia or to be diverted from its vision and mission.

The continued assertion that ONLF has a relationship with Al-Shabab, which is often TPLF instigated propaganda has no basis in reality. Al-Shabab tried to infiltrate into Ogaden in 2009 and actually killed five ONLF fighters who were not aware of their presence close to the Somalia border. ONLF sent a message to them ordering them to leave the Ogaden immediately. They refused and attacked the Ogaden Liberation Army which forced them out of the territory and ever since has been keeping them from re-entering it. Subsequently AL-Shabab decided to kill every ONLF member they found in Somalia. ONLF’s former Defence Secretary Mr Illias Sh. Ali, three central committee members and scores of senior and junior officers summarily executed by Al-Shabab.

In addition, ONLF always supported the fledging transitional governments in Somalia and persuading those it had influence on to be always on the side of the Somali government. ONLF has congratulated all presidents during the transitional period since 1991 including the current president.

ONLF is a national liberation organisation that struggles for the right of self-determination of Somali people under Ethiopian rule. ONLF was founded in  1984 after Western Somali Liberation Front floundered. It  was formed to continue the centuries long struggle of the Somali nation to  regain the sovereignty of the Somali people that was lost during the colonial scramble for Africa. A struggle that has never stopped and was waged under many different names and banners. The Dervishes, Somali Youth League (SYL), Nasrallah, and the Geeshka, the Somali republic and the Somali Democratic Republic. The shared vision of the Somali nation to restore their freedom had  succeeded in liberating British and Italian Somalilands. After the Somali republic collapsed,   the quest for the rights of Somali people that were left out continued and the independent Somali people wholeheartedly supported and still support their oppressed brethren in Ethiopia.

Ever since the collapse  of the Somali government, the TPLF regime in Ethiopia has been actively engaged in destroying the sacred bond between the Somali people fostered through the millennia by shared ancestry, culture and economic symbiosis. And to do  that TPLF has been consistently destabilizing Somalia and sponsoring the inclusion of its agents into all the transitional governments of Somalia. Therefore, ONLF believes this act by the cabinet is a continuation of that policy and the decision by the Somali cabinet is a proof of that interference and influence.

The minister stated that the cabinet decision was legal and was based on the laws of the land and agreements reached with Ethiopia. That is far from the truth. It just shows the lack of knowledge by the current administration in Somalia of both the laws of Somalia , African Union (AU), Intergovernmental Authority on Development(IGAD) and International Laws and conventions.

First  of all  there is no actual agreement between the Somali republic and Ethiopia regarding extradition. Somalia never even signed the IGAD convention on Extradition, which if signed both governments  would have violated.  However, the cabinet claimed that  local agreements signed between representatives of Galmudug region of Somalia and the Somali regional administration under Ethiopian rule reached in order to resolve massacres committed by the Liyu Police against  Somali clans inside the Ogaden related to Galmudug clans in Somalia. The minister stated that  government used those agreements to  ‘extradite’ Mr Muse  legally to Ethiopia. However, the two representatives of the Galmudug region people, who signed those agreements rejected those assertion as reported by the BBC and VOA Somali services. Furthermore, the cabinet ignored in its legal considerations Article 12 on Application of the Fundamental Rights recognised by the Somali state.

The Issue of Mr Muse’s rendition is a violation of both the Somali constitution, the AU, UN and Geneva Convention regarding both the Human and political rights of Mr Muse. Apart from his legal rights as Somali citizen by birth, The constitution of Somalia gives Mr Muse clear legal rights that the Cabinet has denied him.  ONLF bases that assertion on the followings:

1. Mr Abdikarin Sh Muse is Somali national and has served in the Somali national army and has a right to be protected by his people and state

2. Mr Muse has a right to his political opinion and the right to choose to support his people wherever they are

3. Mr Muse was dehumanised and maltreated during his detention as shown by the video and picture  circulated in the social media, thus  breaking Article 3 (4) and article 10  of the Somalia constitution

4. The Somali Security arrested and handed over Mr Muse to Ethiopia without due process authorised by court breaking articles Article 34 on  Access to Courts and Legal Defence, Article 35 on The Rights of the Accused

and Article 127 on  Principles for the Security Forces

5. Mr Muse’s rendition was based on an administrative decision that did not respect both the laws of Somalia  and regional and international conventions

6. Mr Muse was not given even the benefits of what the Somalia law says about extradition

7. Even if Mr Muse was not considered a Somali citizen he had a right as Refugee under Somalia constitution and article 37 which was ignored

8. Somalia never signed the IGAD extradition Treaty, however even if would have done so, the cabinet would have violated that too. Apart from all other rights IGAD convention gives states the right to refuse extradition if the issue is of a political nature or there is evidence of torture in the receiving state

The Somalia Cabinet not only violated the Somali constitution but in addition has violated the IGAD as  well as the Geneva Conventions and the Universal Declaration of human rights.

Regardless of  whether the Somalia cabinet considered Mr Muse a Somali Citizen or not, all those rights in the Somali constitution,  IGAD convention and international laws clearly show that the decision of the cabinet was illegal and has violated the laws of the Somalia. Mr Muse was not given a fair trial in courts of law with legal counsel  in the countries of both offending parties, nor was he given the legal protection accorded either as a Somali citizen or as a political person. He was not protected in regard to the fact that he could be subject to degrading and dehumanising practices of the TPLF-led regime which are documented by the Human rights organisations.

Concocting false accusations and claiming legality is unsuitable for representative of the Somali people and the religion, culture and unity, and dignity of the Somali nation. Many countries in the world, respecting their domestic and international laws allow ONLF leaders and communities to advocate for their rights. How is it acceptable then that ONLF members are to be hunted down and sold like slaves by their own kith and kin to an unrelenting enemy that even denies the Somali people under its rule to get proper treatment against pandemic diseases like cholera in time to prevent thousands of preventable deaths?

ONLF has been in negotiations with the Ethiopian government facilitated by Kenya which shows that it has genuinely tried to solve the conflict peacefully and if the Somali cabinet was really interested in a peaceful Horn of Africa it would  have striven to expand that process and take part in finding a fair and lasting  solution. As long as the rights of the Somali people under Ethiopian rule are not given their self-determination,  peace in the Horn of Africa will be illusive and Somalia and Ethiopia will never have genuine peace, regardless of whether ONLF exists or not.

ONLF requests from the Somali people, government  and Parliament, the AU and the UN to act on this matter and provide justice to Abdikarin Sh Muse and hold  those responsible for this crime accountable. ONLF believes that is decision is an insult to the hundreds of thousands of Somalis who sacrificed their lives for attaining the rights and dignity of the Somali people and has violated the laws of Somalia and international laws and conventions.

ONLF calls upon the Somali government to rectify its mistakes and start remedying the damage already done, including diplomatic efforts to return Mr Muse, taking back its illegal injunction against ONLF and  its members. It is not the intention of ONLF to see the dignity ,Unity and Sovereignty of the Somali people and government jeopardized but such decisions would endangers the safety and security of every Somali citizen wherever he or she maybe.

According to the Somali construction the sovereignty of the Somali nation resides with the Somali people. It incumbent upon the member of the Somali parliament to insure that the sovereignty , dignity and the rights of  every Somali citizen is protected. If the right of a single Somali citizen is violated , the rights of every Somali citizen is violated.

ONLF thanks the Somali people and members of parliament for standing up for Mr Abdikarin muse and will continue to support their effort to get a genuine sovereign Somali government in Somalia.

Issued by ONLF

End

___________________

Endnotes

[1] Statement by Honourable Mahad Salad (MP) Somalia

“Ethiopian officials mentioned ONLF during our meetings, but I do not know any agreement that we signed concerning ONLF and I was not representing the federal government of Somalia,” he said. Mahad Salad, Somalia’s former minister of state for presidential affairs, also denied the existence of a federal-level agreement.

“We were representing people in the region and went to Ethiopia in search of a solution for a regional conflict. The agreement was collaborating on security in general and pacifying the local people, but ONLF was not in the eight-article agreement we signed,” Salad said. Like Guuleed, he said he was not a government representative.

Statement by Honourable Abdikarim Guuleed (MP) Somalia

“It was a very strange and mistaken decision committed by the Somali government when they handed over a Somali citizen to Ethiopia, and now they did another mistake,” said Abdulkarim Guuleed, the former governor of Galmudug. “That agreement cannot be used as a justification for the handing over of Muse to Ethiopia because it had nothing to do with ONLF or exchange of criminals or prisoners.” The Constitution of the Federal Republic of Somalia promotes human rights, the rule of law, general standards of international law, justice, participatory consultative and inclusive government, and the separation of powers between the legislature, executive and an independent judiciary, in order to ensure accountability, efficiency and responsiveness to the interests of the people.

[1] Article 12. on Application of the Fundamental Rights states

(1)  The fundamental rights and freedoms recognized in this Chapter shall always be respected in the making and application of the law. Likewise, they must be respected by all individuals and private organisations, as well as by every state institution and state official as they carry out their official functions.

(2)  It is the responsibility of the state not only to ensure it does not violate rights through its actions, but also to take reasonable steps to protect the rights of the people from abuse by others.

(3)  The rights recognized in this Chapter may be limited only by a law as provided for in Article 38.

[1] Article 3(4) The Constitution of the Federal Republic of Somalia promotes human rights, the rule of law, general standards of international law, justice, participatory consultative and inclusive government, and the separation of powers between the legislature, executive and an independent judiciary, in order to ensure accountability, efficiency and responsiveness to the interests of the people.

[1] Article 10. on Human Dignity states that

(1)  Human dignity is given by God to every human being, and this is the basis for all human rights.

(2)  Human dignity is inviolable and must be protected by all.

(3)  State power must not be exercised in a manner that violates human dignity

[1] Article 34. on Access to Courts and Legal Defence states

  • Every person is entitled to file a legal case before a competent court.
  • Every person has the right to a fair public hearing by an independent and impartial court or tribunal, to be held within a reasonable time, and to determine:
    1. Any question of civil rights and obligations; or
    2. Any criminal charge.
  • Every person is entitled to defend him or herself from the case he or she is party to, whatever the level or stage of the proceedings may be.
  • The state shall provide free legal defence to the people who do not have the means of doing so themselves.
  • The state shall provide free legal defence to individuals or communities if they are legally pursuing the public interest.

[1] Article 35. on The Rights of the Accused 
states

(1)  The accused is presumed innocent until proven guilty in a final manner by a court of law.

(2)  Every person arrested or detained has the right to be informed promptly of the reason for their arrest or detention in a language that the person understands.

(3)  Every person arrested or detained shall have the right for his or her family and relatives to be informed of his or her situation.

(4)  A person may not be compelled to self-incriminate, and a verdict may not be based on evidence acquired by means of coercion.

(5)  Every person who is arrested has the right to be brought before a competent court within 48 hours of the arrest.

(6)  Every person who is arrested or detained has the right to choose, and to consult with, a legal practitioner and if he or she cannot afford one, the State must appoint a legal practitioner for him or her.

(7)  Every person brought before a court of law for an alleged criminal offence is entitled to a fair trial.

(8)  The accused has the right to be present at their trial.

(9)  The accused has the right to challenge the evidence presented against him or her.

(10)  The accused has the right to an interpreter if the accused person does not understand the language being used in the court.

(11)  The accused cannot be kept in an illegal detention centre, and must be granted visits by his or her family, doctor or lawyer.

 

[1] Article 127. Principles for the Security Forces

(1) The security forces must respect the following principles:

(a)  Professionalism, discipline and patriotism;

(b)  Respect for the rule of law, democratic institutions and fundamental rights;

(c)  A commitment to uphold the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Somalia;

(d)  Transparency and accountability;

(e)  Political neutrality; and

(f)  Members of the forces shall be trained on the implementation of this Constitution, the laws of the land and the international treaties to which the Federal Republic of Somalia is a party.

[1] Article 33. on Just Administrative Decisions 
states

Every person has the right to administrative decisions that are lawful, reasonable and conducted in a procedurally fair manner

[1] Article 36. Extradition of the Accused and Criminals

(1)  Any person who has been accused or convicted may be extradited only in a manner prescribed by law and on the basis of an international treaty or convention which the Federal Republic of Somalia is party to, and which obliges the Federal State of Somalia to extradite the accused or convicted.

(2)  Any accused or convicted person shall be extradited only in accordance with international law and practice, and on the basis of legislation governing extradition, which has been passed by the Federal Parliament.

 

[1] Article 37. On Refugees and Asylum 
states

(1)  Every person who has sought refuge in the Federal Republic of Somalia has the right not to be returned or taken to any country in which that person has a well-founded fear of persecution.

(2)  The Federal Parliament shall enact legislation in compliance with international law, regulating refugees and asylum seekers.

 

[1] Article 3: on Extradition offence states that

  1. For the purpose of this Convention, an extradition offence is an offence that is punishable under the laws of both the requesting and requested State Party by imprisonment or other deprivation of liberty for a period of at least one year, or by a more severe penalty. Where the request for extradition relates to a person wanted for the enforcement of a sentence of imprisonment or other deprivation of liberty imposed for such an offence, extradition may be refused if a period of less than six months of such sentence remains to be served.

Mr Muse was never sentenced in Ethiopia.

 

Article 4: on Applicable law states that

The requested State Party shall deal with the request in accordance with its laws.

Article 5(1): Extradition of nationals

  1. A State Party shall have the right to refuse extradition of its nationals.
  2. b) Each State Party may, by a declaration made at the time of signature or of deposit of its instrument of ratification or accession, define as far as it is concerned the term “nationals” within the meaning of this Convention.

Mr Muse was a Somali National and was an officer of the Somali army in the 70’s and 80’s

 

Article 6: on Grounds for refusal to extradite states that

  1. Extradition shall be refused in any one of the following circumstances:
  2. a) if the offence for which extradition is requested is of a political nature. An offence of a political nature shall not include any offence in respect of which the States Parties have assumed an obligation, pursuant to any multilateral convention, or under international law, to take prosecutorial action where they do not extradite, or any other offence that the State Parties have agreed is not an offence of a political character for the purposes of extradition;

Clearly the request is of A political nature since Mr Muse is the executive member of ONLF a political entity in conflict with Ethiopia

  1. b) if the requested State Party has substantial grounds for believing that the request for extradition has been made for the purpose of prosecuting or punishing a person on account of that person’s race, religion, nationality, ethnic origin, political opinion, sex or status or that the person’s position may be prejudiced for any of those reasons;
  2. c) if the offence for which extradition is requested constitutes an offence under military law, which is not an offence under ordinary criminal law;

Mr Muse is struggling the rights of the marginalised Somali under Ethiopian rule who are and were subjected to marginalisation and human rights violations based on their ethnicity, religion and seeking to exercise the political rights of self-determination and genuine self-rule.

  1. f) if the person whose extradition is requested has been, or would be subjected in the requesting State Party to, torture, or cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, or if that person has not received or would not receive the minimum guarantees in criminal proceedings, as contained in Article 7 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples Rights and Article 14 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; or,

the TPLF regime is well known and has been documented to use torture and degrading treatment to its political opponents

  1. g) if the judgment of the requesting State Party has been rendered in absentia and the convicted person has not had sufficient notice of the trial or the opportunity to arrange for his defence and he has not had, or will not have, the opportunity to have the case retried in his or her presence.
Satenaw
By Satenaw September 9, 2017 06:43
Write a comment

No Comments

No Comments Yet!

Let me tell You a sad story ! There are no comments yet, but You can be first one to comment this article.

Write a comment
View comments

Write a comment

Your e-mail address will not be published.
Required fields are marked*

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Satenaw Breaking News - Your right to know!